A reference from Weave

Find a term

Follow the path from opening a pull request to merging it. Explore review practices, collaboration patterns, and the measurements that reveal bottlenecks.

Terms beginning with R

53 terms
  • Rebase before review

    Rebase before review is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Rebase merge

    Rebase merge is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Reopened review

    Reopened review is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Requested changes

    Requested changes is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Required review

    Required review is a repository or branch rule that blocks integration until specified review conditions are met.

    Code review
  • Revert review

    Revert review is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review abandonment

    Review abandonment is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review backlog

    A code review backlog is the accumulated set of proposed changes that still require review activity or a final decision.

    Code review
  • Review bottleneck

    A review bottleneck is a constrained person, team, policy, or stage that limits the movement of proposed changes.

    Code review
  • Review capacity buffer

    A review capacity buffer is deliberately uncommitted reviewer capacity reserved for incoming changes, urgent work, and variation in review difficulty.

    Code review
  • Review comment

    Review comment is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review comment density

    Review comment density is the number of review comments relative to a chosen unit such as changed lines, files, or pull requests.

    Code review
  • Review comment resolution

    Review comment resolution tracks whether feedback receives a response, code change, explicit rationale, or documented decision.

    Code review
  • Review coverage

    Review coverage describes the share of eligible changes that receive the intended review evidence before integration.

    Code review
  • Review cycle count

    Review cycle count is the number of meaningful feedback and revision cycles a change passes through before its review is complete.

    Code review
  • Review defect detection

    Review defect detection is the practice of finding correctness, security, reliability, or maintainability problems before code reaches later stages.

    Code review
  • Review depth

    Review depth describes how carefully a change is examined across behavior, design, tests, security, and maintainability.

    Code review
  • Review effectiveness

    Review effectiveness is the extent to which a review finds useful problems, improves shared understanding, and supports a safe change.

    Code review
  • Review finding rate

    Review finding rate is the frequency at which a review identifies a defined issue class before a change is integrated.

    Code review
  • Review handoff

    A code review handoff transfers responsibility for understanding and progressing a proposed change from one reviewer or team to another.

    Code review
  • Review iteration

    A review iteration is one cycle of author changes followed by reviewer feedback on the same proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review load distribution

    Review load distribution shows how review requests or completed reviews are spread across people, teams, repositories, or change types.

    Code review
  • Review meeting

    Review meeting is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review noise

    Review noise is feedback or workflow activity that consumes attention without helping a reviewer or author make a safer, clearer change.

    Code review
  • Review objective

    Review objective is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review plan

    Review plan is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review priority

    Review priority is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review queue age

    Review queue age is the time that pending review work has remained without the next required action.

    Code review
  • Review queue depth

    Review queue depth measures the number of pending review items at a point in time or across a defined workflow stage.

    Code review
  • Review queue pressure

    Review queue pressure is the condition in which pending review work consumes more capacity than the responsible reviewers can sustainably provide.

    Code review
  • Review rejection

    Review rejection is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review rejection rate

    Review rejection rate is the share of submitted changes that are declined, abandoned, or sent back rather than accepted in their current form.

    Code review
  • Review reopen rate

    Review reopen rate is the share of closed review requests that become active again for additional changes or decisions.

    Code review
  • Review request

    Review request is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review response time

    Review response time measures how long a reviewer or author takes to respond to the next actionable event in a review conversation.

    Code review
  • Review rework

    Review rework is the author effort or change volume produced in response to review feedback before a proposed change is accepted.

    Code review
  • Review scope

    Review scope is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review service level expectation

    A review service level expectation is a probabilistic statement about how long a defined class of review requests usually takes.

    Code review
  • Review signal-to-noise ratio

    Review signal-to-noise ratio compares useful, actionable review feedback with comments that are irrelevant, duplicated, or purely cosmetic.

    Code review
  • Review SLE

    Review service-level expectation is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review state

    Review state is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Review turnaround time

    Review turnaround time is the elapsed duration from a review request to a defined completion point, such as approval or final feedback.

    Code review
  • Review wait time

    Review wait time is the portion of a change's lifecycle spent waiting for a reviewer, response, or approval rather than receiving active feedback.

    Code review
  • Reviewable change

    Reviewable change is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Reviewer

    Reviewer is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Reviewer assignment

    Reviewer assignment is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Reviewer availability

    Reviewer availability is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Reviewer diversity

    Reviewer diversity is the range of technical perspectives, system familiarity, and lived experience represented in review decisions.

    Code review
  • Reviewer expertise

    Reviewer expertise is a practical concept in a pull-request workflow that shapes how people examine, discuss, own, or integrate a proposed change.

    Code review
  • Reviewer load

    Reviewer load is the amount and complexity of review work assigned to or completed by an individual or group.

    Code review